Can't see the region you're looking for? You can find a list of our global locations here
Guest blog by Helen O’Reilly, Associate, Bond Bryan
Our world is rapidly changing and adapting, never more relevant than during the current global pandemic. As we consider options to return to public spaces, it is paramount for us to incorporate people's health and wellbeing as ultimate design drivers. This is a critical time and opportunity to integrate our built environment into the power of nature, inducing a sense of calm for people within our buildings. In recent months, our lives have been forced to slow down and many of us have reconnected to community and nature – in our gardens, streetscapes, and homes. We have reconnected with our own love of life; taken time to pause in the moment and reconnect ourselves back to nature.
Bond Bryan have been working very closely with Ian Chadwick, Director at Wellbeing Places, designing a number of wellbeing schemes. These are of various sizes, in different regions and contexts - using biophilic design as a key element of our vision, we always design with the end-users’ needs first and foremost.
Biophilia is our innate connection to nature, on a human level, that is vital to maintaining good physical and mental health, and wellbeing. It’s about bringing people into close and frequent contact with nature and nurturing a love of place. Our vision is people first, always! We create places which contribute positively to whole communities, by enhancing local assets, inspiration, and potential of spaces. Our purpose is to create new spaces that promote people's health, happiness, and wellbeing – whilst also acting to reduce social isolation and loneliness.
Our design philosophy is built upon three simple strategic pillars:
When we incorporate biophilic design into our buildings, we engage our senses. Biophilic design has profound benefits to engaging our senses and supporting emotional wellbeing: reducing stress levels, increasing kindness, improving learner engagement, and increasing social connectivity. Our aim is to simultaneously improve the quality of wellbeing for the individuals and wider local communities whilst enhancing social, economic and environmental sustainability. We design with the intrinsic human need to affiliate with nature.
The table below demonstrates how good design can reduce stress, increase cognitive performance, emotion and mood enhancement within us.
Nature in the space | ||||
14 patterns | * | Stress reduction | Cognitive performance | Emotion, mood and preference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Visual connection with nature | *** | Lowered blood pressure and heart rate (Brown, Barton, and Gladwell, 2013; van den Berg, Hartig & Staats, 2007; Tsunetsugu & Miyazaki, 2005) |
Improved mental engagement/attentiveness (Biederman & Vessel, 2006) |
Positively impacted attitude and overall happiness (Barton & Pretty, 2010) |
Non-visual connection with nature | ** | Reduced systolic blood pressure and stress hormones (Park, Tsunetsugu, Kasetani et al., 2009; Hartig, Evans, Jamner et al., 2003; Orsega-Smith, Mowen, Payne et al., 2004; Ulrich, Simons, Losito et al., 1991) |
Positively impacted cognitive performance (Mehta, Zhu & Cheema, 2012; Ljungberg, Neely, & Lundström, 2004) |
Perceived improvements in mental health and tranquility (Li, Kobayashi, Inagaki et al., 2012; Jahncke, et al., 2011; Tsunetsugu, Park & Miyazaki, 2010; Kim, Ren, & Fielding, 2007; Stigsdotter & Grahn, 2003 |
Non-rhythmic sensory stimuli | ** | Positively impacted heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and sympathetic nervous system activity (Li, 2009; Park et al., 2008; Kahn et al., 2008; Beauchamp et al., 2003; Ulrich et al., 1991) |
Observed and quantified behavioural measures of attention and exploration (Windhager et al., 2011) |
|
Thermal and airflow variability | ** | Positively impacted comfort, well-being and productivity (Heerwagen, 2006; Tham & Willem, 2005; Wigö, 2005) |
Positively impacted concentration (Hartig et al., 2003; Hartig et al., 1991; R. Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989) |
Improved perception of spacial and temporal pleasure (allesthesia) (Parkinson, de Dear & Candido, 2012; Zhang, Arens, Huizenga & Han, 2010; Arens, Zhang & Huizenga, 2006; Zhang, 2003; de Dear & Brager, 2002; Heschong, 1979) |
Presence of water | ** | Reduced stress, increased feelings of tranquility, lower heart rate and blood pressure (Alvarsson, Wiens, & Nilsson, 2010; Pheasant, Fisher, Watts et al., 2010; Biederman & Vessel, 2006) |
Improved concentration and memory restoration Alvarsson et al., 2010; Biderman & Vessel, 2006) Enhanced perception and psychological awareness (Alvarsson et al., 2010; Hunter et al., 2010) |
Observed preferences and positive emotional responses (WIndhager, 2011; Barton & Pretty, 2010; White, Smith, Humphryes et al., 2010; Karmenov & Hamel, 2008; Biederman & Vessel, 2006; Heerwagen & Orians, 1993; Ruso & Atzwanger, 2003; Ulrich, 1983) |
Dynamic and diffuse light | ** | Positively impacted circadian system functioning (Figueiro, Brons, Plitnick et al., 2011; Beckett & Roden, 2009) Increased visual comfort (Elyezadi, 2012; Kim & Kim, 2007) |
||
Connection with natural systems | Enhanced positive health responses; shifted perception of environment (Kellert et al., 2008) |
|||
Natural analogues | ||||
Biomorphic forms and patterns | * | Observed view preference (Vessel, 2012; Joye, 2007) |
||
Material connection with nature | Decreased diastolic blood pressure (Tsunetsugu, Miyazaki & Sato, 2007) Improved creative performance (Lichtenfield et al., 2012) |
Improved comfort (Tsunetsugu, Miyazaki & Sato, 2007) |
||
Complexity and order | ** | Positively impacted perceptual and physiological stress responses (Salingaros, 2012; Joye, 2007; Taylor, 2006; S. Kaplan, 1988) |
Observed view preference (Salingaros, 2012; Hägerhäll, Laike, Taylor et al., 2008; Hägerhäll, Purcell, & Taylor, 2004; Taylor, 2006) |
|
Nature of the space | ||||
Prospect | *** | Reduced stress (Grahn & Stigsdotter, 2010) |
Reduced boredom, irritation, fatigue (Clearwater & Coss, 1991) |
Improved comfort and safety (Herzog & Bryce, 2007; Wang & Taylor, 2006; Petherick, 2000) |
Refuge | *** | Improved concentration, attention, and perception of safety (Grahn & Stigsdotter, 2010; Wang & Taylor 2006; Petherick, 2000; Ulrich et al., 1993) |
||
Mystery | ** | Induced strong pleasure response (Biederman, 2011; Salimpoor, Benovoy, Larcher et al., 2011; Ikemi, 2005; Blood & Zatorre, 2001) |
||
Risk/Peril | * | Resulted in strong dopamine or pleasure responses (Kohno et al., 2013; Wang & Tsien, 2011; Zald et al., 2008) |